I shall not insist that the historic/biblical figure of
Nebuchadnezzar is uniquely apt for the pivotal figure of the
‘democratic’ history in the making at this moment — for
one thing, Nebu was a nation builder and a warrior.
One could argue, even more convincingly for the figure of
Balthazar, his successor, or indeed, Emperor Nero as
reference point — you all remember him — the emperor who
took to fiddling while Rome was burning.
However, you should easily recall why I opted for
King Nebu — the figure that currently sits on the top
of our political pile himself evoked it, albeit in a
context that virtuously disclaimed any similarities,
even tendencies. Perhaps, he meant it at the time
when he claimed: ‘I am no Nebuchadnezzar’.
Perhaps, not!
One judges leaders on acts however, not
pronouncements, which are often as reliable as
electoral promises.
King Nebu remains relevant —
and not only for leadership. We, the citizens, are
beginning to feel the heat...
Without any claims to prophecy — unlike Shadrach and
company, we wake up each morning to a sensation that we
have been cast in the furnace together with those who at
least committed the crime of dissent or criticism. No divine
miracle appears to be at hand for a last-minute rescue.
In desperation, one is reduced to hoping that the evocation
of his own biblical reference point will resonate somewhere
in the mind of one who is so ostentatiously humble and
pious, kneels at the feet of a priest who could easily be
mistaken for an office worker, and cultivates the high and
holy company of acknowledged spokesmen of God.
So, here goes. Gentlemen of the Press, let’s not beat
around the bush: the line has been drawn. The people must
decide — whether to submit or resist. We may be no-count
plebians in the sight of the new-born patricians of Aso
Rock and their apologists but — must we revert to the
Abacharian status of glorified slaves? Of course, it is up to
any people to decide.
The praetorian guards have been let loose — to teach the
rabble their place. The recent choice of a new leader for the
Guard was clearly no accident, and this hitherto unknown
enforcer, one Suleiman Abba, has wasted no time in
inaugurating a season of brutish power.
When a people’s elected emissaries are disenfranchised,
cast out like vagrants and resort to scaling fences to
engage in their designated functions, the people get the
message.
However, the choice is always there, and each
choice comes at a cost. It is either we pay now, or pay
later.
The latest action of the supposed guardians of the law
against the nation’s lawgivers is an unambiguous
declaration of war against the people. I am glad that a
commentator has referred to it as an attempted coup-de-
tat. And it nearly worked.
Legislators are not elected for their athletic prowess, and
such endeavours should not be demanded of them. There
are even presidents and prime ministers who were elected
despite physical handicaps. The brain is where it matters,
the vision and commitment to service. Our legislators
however have been made to perform over and beyond the
call of the Olympics.
I don’t understand why some media have described their
action as a show of shame — this is a very careless, easily
misapplied designation. The act of scaling gates and walls
to fulfill their duty by the people must be set down as their
finest hour. They must be applauded, not derided.
If shame belongs anywhere, it belongs to the Inspector-
General of Police and his slavish adherence to
conspiratorial, illegal, and unconstitutional instructions —
to undermine a democratic structure, and one — to make
matters worse — convoked in response to an emergency of
dire public concern.
What sticks to this policeman is worse than shame; it is
infamy. Such a public servant deserves to be publicly
pilloried, tried and meted a punishment that is appropriate
to treasonable acts, if only to serve as a deterrent to others
in positions of responsibility under the law.
To demand less
is to reduce ourselves below the status free citizens of a
free nation.
It means we endorse violence against our representatives,
that we are content to submit ourselves to the jackboots of
naked force. It is to annunciate the era of the brute, as the
current fundamental modality of governance.
For this latest outrage, one in an escalating series of
impunity, the buck stops yet again at the presidency, and
that incumbent, Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, continues to
surprise us in ways that very few could have conjectured.
Peaking at his own personalised example where he set the
law of simple arithmetic on its head — I refer to the split in
the Governors’ Forum, and his ‘formal’ recognition of the
minority will in a straightforward, peer election —
democracy has been rendered meaningless where it
should be most fervently exemplified.
Nothing is more unworthy of leadership than to degrade a
system by which one attains fulfillment, and this is what
the nation has witnessed time and time again in various
parts of the nation, the recent affront against the legislative
chamber being only the most blatant and unconscionable.
We know, of course, that this is not the first of its kind in
the nation’s history, but precedents are not binding.
Each
leader selects his or her own model for emulation or
avoidance, and that choice is certain indication of the true
nature of such a leader, and a clue to the kind of conduct
that a people can expect of him.
It is a warning. His choices for the occupancy of crucial
public positions — such as the protective arm of the nation
— constitutes an even more immediate and constant public
alert.
The signals are ominous — for and beyond 2015.
These, to state the obvious, are not ordinary times. The
menace of Boko Haram hangs over the corporate entity
called a nation and over every individual, citizen or mere
bird of passage.
The cliché ‘heating up the polity’ may grate the eardrums
with its banality but I think that we have a right to demand
of a leader not to stoke up the furnace in which events have
cast its citizens.
Every day records a new violation of our humanity.
The
atrocious targeting of the great mosque of Kano has
rendered any lingering doubt of impending national
imposition an invitation for collective suicide, preferably
through piecemeal dismemberment.
The theories of cause and effect can wait, or continue — it
does not matter — the omniscient in such matters continue
to pontificate, some of them blithely forgetting that they
indeed contributed to policies that landed us in this brutal
cleft.
What does matter is an awareness that the nation is only
part of a global eruption of fundamentalist delusions whose
staple diet consists of destabilisation and dehumanisation
— all summed up as an ideology of Hate for the different.
For the defiant.
This should form the basis of understanding by which an
implacable enemy is confronted.
And it should form the
basis of leadership awareness. It should have led, by now,
to national mobilisation on an unprecedented scale, one
that may even impinge, however temporarily, on those
liberties that you and I consider non-negotiable in our
rights as citizens.
However, imagine, just imagine that today’s leadership
were of such a cast of mind, one that makes demands of
sacrifice from the citizens.
The response would be outright
rejection. And deservedly so, because any such motion
would be distrusted. It would be seen as an act of
insincerity, an opportunity to acquire even more powers for
citizen enslavement.
This is the price you pay for encroaching on the precincts
and entitlements of others with whom you share a structure
of authority.
You lose the trust of the other legs of — in this
case — a governance tripod.
Every act, especially in abnormal circumstances, would be
viewed with extreme suspicion, and the gates open wide,
without any strenuous effort on its part, to the triumphal
progression of the enemy. That is the collateral damage
that the abuse of power attracts to whatever should be a
collaborative undertaking.
Where governance has degenerated to such a level that
any individual, on account of his uniform, can stop an
elected representative of a people, in this case a governor,
from going about his legitimate duties or exercising his
basic, elementary right as a citizen — as happened during
the recent Ekiti elections — we do not need to guess what
happens in a situation that calls for general mobilisation,
on which, needless to say, the good will and trust of all
arms of governance depend in a crisis.
This, of course,
requires the capacity for forward-thinking.
The shambles that punctuated a presidential campaign visit
at the Obafemi Awolowo University a few days ago merely
underline the total alienation of President Jonathan from
the reality that has engulfed the nation.
Yes, political campaigns are part and parcel of the
bloodline of the democratic process. We know that they
never stop. However, that a national leader should go
campaigning on the platform of ethnic support at a time
when priorities dictate a united national engagement for
survival, is a grotesque undertaking that was tragically
rebuked in the massacre of worshippers and desecration of
the Kano mosques, almost simultaneously with the
alienated gathering of selected crowned heads and
journeymen at the OAU campus, a macabre echo of
Balthazar’s feast.
Long before Nyanya, long before Chibok, long before the
mildest of the now innumerable violations of our basic right
to exist as free citizens, the march of a nation towards
implosion has dominated the landscape, but an obsession
with the pettiness of power has obscured remedial vision
and thus, the creative options constantly open to any
prescient leadership.
If Somalia was too far away as instruction, then surely Mali
remains sufficiently close warning. With the invasion of
Mali by al Qaeda and its clones and surrogates, we moved
from mere portents, from mere distant rumblings, to the
wake-up knock right against our gates — and yet
leadership slumber remained unbroken.
Mali was retrieved, a breathing space created, but it would
appear that this was when complacency took over and
snoring attained its highest pitch.
The few waking
moments have been spent on sterile, tawdry intrigues and
consolidation on the marshes and quicksands of power.
That failure in the aggressive destabilisation of the enemy
is the cross that the nation bears today — but we must
concede that this gross dereliction applies not only to
Nigeria but to her neighbours — indeed to ECOWAS — and
the collective failure for concerted action.
Leadership counts however, and it was Nigeria that took
the lead in that critical and timely mission that was
spearheaded by France.
The lesson of Mali was completely lost on complacent
leadership however, leaving time and space for alien
invaders to make common cause with the internal,
unleashing destruction at will and dancing around a nation
whose armed forces have acquitted themselves creditably
on foreign missions.
The architect of that initial policy of containment was the
recently deceased Gbenga Ashiru, then Foreign Minister,
unceremoniously removed for the ends of premature
politicking, before the logical development of that initiative.
Now, of course, the very manipulators of Ashiru’s removal
are falling over one another to heap praises on the quality
of his achievements in office, skirting — who can blame
them! — the tawdry reasons for his removal from office.
Petty, retaliatory calculations that placed the interests of
the nation, the very security of its people in acute jeopardy
from unfinished business. Ashiru’s presence in that
position had become a fly in the palm wine of Balthasar’s
Feast.
Caution: no one dares predict that the plight of Nigerians
would be any rosier had his ideas been pursued till the very
end. The point is simply this — a process was interrupted,
truncated without thought, petty politicking being made to
override substance. I wrote Ashiru to commiserate with him
and to bolster his morale.
He replied in only two words:
USE AND DUMP!
Defend yourselves! This is what the perceptive have
preached and groups like the so-called Junior Task Force
translated into action, the real heroes of the defence of the
tattered ‘Nigerian sovereignty’.
Among them, a hitherto unknown, a woman, has become
one of the symbols of resistance, an ordinary woman
turned extraordinary, one of the hunters who routed the
diabolical hordes who appear to rout our military even
before their appearance.
Does it sound today as whimsical as it may have sounded
to some when I urged the organisation of willing survivors
of Boko Haram into local defence corps, their women
especially, proposed that they be kitted out fully, and
formally inducted as auxiliaries.
Ladi, it would appear, needed no such urging from any
direction.
It was obvious to her, and others like her that it
was futile to await salvation from a centre that is so self-
obsessed with power that it no longer sees even the danger
to its very existence.
A people must defend itself. These are no ordinary times,
and we have moved beyond orthodox solutions. “Where
two or three are gathered together…” — I shall complete
those words my own way: “They must anticipate, organise,
obtaining or improvising the wherewithal as circumstances
dictate. Fascism is the eternal enemy of freedom, and it
comes both in internal and external forms.”
Today, it would be premature to claim that Suleiman Abba
and the many incarnations of Shekau are cut from the
same mould but remember, we have been here before. Who
can forget Sunday Adewusi, the original Robo-Cop!
And so, consider this; the ripples from the fascistic
eruption of a Suleiman Abba may actually result in far
greater casualties and inhuman degradation of society than
those so far recorded even at the hands of Shekau and his
cohorts.
That is the real and present danger.
This is why the call for vigilance is real and urgent, and a
need to clip the wings of a predatory bird before it devours
society, becomes paramount.
Beset by external and internal threats to liberty and dignity,
abandoned internally by a do-it-yourself government on
the one hand, and externally by (claimed) impediments
from cynical allies — as we are made to believe in the
media — let no one cry Anarchy when the people respond
to that historic cry of liberation, to which one leader after
another — the most recent being the Emir of Kano and the
Ulama leader, Yahaha Jingir — have felt moved to urge
upon their people: “Citizens, Defend yourselves!”
• Being a press conference addressed by Professor Soyinka
at the Freedom Park, Broad Street, Lagos, yesterday.
-
by Wole Soyinka
FOR MORE LATEST HOT GIST ADD US ON
BBM--- C0046DF41 YOU CAN ALSO ADD US ON 7ACC48AD
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
0 comments:
Post a Comment